Talking about the risk perception of MNCs into the Middle East

Talking about the risk perception of MNCs into the Middle East

Blog Article

Studies suggest that the prosperity of multinational companies within the Middle East hinges not merely on monetary acumen, but additionally on understanding and integrating into local cultures.

This cultural dimension of risk management demands a change in how MNCs operate. Adapting to regional customs is not just about understanding company etiquette; it also requires much deeper cultural integration, such as for example appreciating regional values, decision-making designs, and the societal norms that impact company practices and employee behaviour. In GCC countries, successful company relationships are built on trust and personal connections instead of just being transactional. Also, MNEs can take advantage of adjusting their human resource administration to reflect the social profiles of regional employees, as variables affecting employee motivation and job satisfaction differ widely across cultures. This involves a change in mindset and strategy from developing robust economic risk management tools to investing in social intelligence and regional expertise as specialists and lawyers such Salem Al Kait and Ammar Haykal in Ras Al Khaimah would probably suggest.

Despite the political instability and unfavourable fiscal conditions in certain elements of the Middle East, international direct investment (FDI) in the area and, particularly, in the Arabian Gulf has been considerably increasing within the last 20 years. The relevance of the Middle East and Gulf markets is growing for FDI, and the linked risk is apparently essential. Yet, research regarding the risk perception of multinationals in the area is lacking in amount and quality, as experts and solicitors like Louise Flanagan in Ras Al Khaimah would likely attest. Although different empirical research reports have investigated the effect of risk on FDI, most analyses have largely been on political risk. Nonetheless, a fresh focus has surfaced in recent research, shining a spotlight on an often-ignored aspect specifically cultural factors. In these pioneering studies, the researchers remarked that businesses and their administration usually really take too lightly the impact of cultural facets due to a lack of knowledge regarding social factors. In reality, some empirical studies have unearthed that cultural differences lower the performance of multinational enterprises.

A lot of the prevailing literature on risk management strategies for multinational corporations emphasises particular uncertainties but omits uncertainties that are tough to quantify. Certainly, lots of research in the international management field has centered on the management of either political risk or foreign currency exchange uncertainties. Finance and insurance coverage literature emphasises the danger variables for which hedging or insurance instruments can be developed to mitigate or move a company's risk visibility. Nonetheless, current studies have brought some fresh and interesting insights. They have sought to fill part of the research gaps by giving empirical understanding of the risk perception of Western multinational corporations and their management strategies on the company level in the Middle East. In one research after collecting and analysing information from 49 major worldwide companies that are have extensive operations in the GCC countries, the authors found the following. Firstly, the risk connected with foreign investments is clearly a great deal more multifaceted compared to often examined factors of political risk and exchange rate exposure. Cultural danger is perceived as more essential than political risk, economic risk, and economic danger. Secondly, even though aspects of Arab culture are reported to have a strong influence on the business environment, most firms struggle to adapt to regional routines and traditions.